Deceit by the Yes Supporters, page-119

And I say
TheYes proponents are justifying a reason to do something
( whatever it is ) by the telling of lies.
One, fifteen, sixteen, twenty five, hundred and twenty six ...pages - which one of those is the truth?

"I did not spit at you" = lie.

There is no treaty and reparations as a part of this - says Albo
This is about treaty and reparations -says Mayo.
Mayo is one of the architects...
Albo hasn' read it.

Someone, some hundreds, some hundreds of thousands are
telling lies, and it is from the YES side.
Since the Yes Side has not offered anything concrete,
what?, can be considered a lie by any undecided or No position holder?

How can one lie about something that is non existent..
Your lies, others' questions...it's that simple.

"Truth telling" after this debacle
is unlikely to be accepted as easily as the previous history/legend/dreamtime of the early aboriginal settler/claimants has been.

Considerably more proof will be required by people judging by the reluctance shown lately to accept apparent deceptive tales of "truth" and the "polishing" of some elements forming part of the narrative.
Or, maybe Australians just a walking away from the negativity.
Positivity like that of Price and Mundine will garnish support rather than the deception and negativity of the old school commies, Langton, Pearson et.al.