Wooooo Hooooo Go BPH :)$$$$$$, page-8741

Hi Hood................. Seriously -------- yes they may have 'stopped it' but why - They did not just make a decision - there was a 'complaint'

From WPL's site :- I rest my case---------------research is often the answer- ! How many more of these will OZ be hit with ? In my opinion 'this is just the start of something B I G ! WPL's info at foot hereof.

How many 'traditional owners' are there offshore Newcastle. You know deep water - 30kls out ???? ---------------------
Watch the Greens TEALS etc brew up a 'sh,, fight.

I want PEP 11 to fire ......................but ya got all these ' sit on your brains ' 'protestors' that get the benefit of oil and gas yet - possibly their 'Uni Degrees ' (you know the highly edu me cated inexperienced experts ) with '0' common sense, cause havoc !
How many know that if they looked around their lounge room and asked, but with truth to themselves- ' was that item produced without some use of -gas - oil ? Nah ---------- would not sink in!
l
The test was done May I think ----and was some many klms offshore ----Notice '... did not properly consult with HER and other TRADITIONAL OWNERS '

"

That approval is being challenged by the Environmental Defenders Office (EDO) which brought a case on behalf of Mardudhunera woman Raelene Cooper.

She is claiming Woodside did not properly consult with her and other traditional owners before it was given approval to carry out the testing by the National Offshore Petroleum Safety and Environmental Management Authority (NOPSEMA).
"

I hold in BUY