The registry could be requested and released and it was.
A shareholder can request the info and the company can provide it.
The company does not have to advise all other shareholders a request has been made for the registry
AVZ decided that they would not provide the emails (I understand) as they believed the motives of the shareholder requesting the registry were not genuine or appropriate.....hence they have released part of the registry but not all the info on the registry
A company is not oblidged to advise shareholders or the market of every single piece of legal action it may be undertaking or involved with
Hence the Fat Tail cry baby "we want everyone's email addresses so we can spam the hell out of them for our ulitmate personal gain" action in WA did not necessarily require a company announcement
Ann: Response to shareholder communications from Fat Tail, page-418
Add to My Watchlist
What is My Watchlist?