When one takes out a loan from a bank there is a certain amount of information the bank would require for them to proceed..
For the better part that information the bank requires could be seen as the bank reducing risk..
the bank would want to know how one intends to pay back the loan and what one owns that they can take if the borrower fails to pay up..amongst other things..
I'm certainly not suggesting Paul has done anything illegal here however in light of what has happened after that deal was made one carnt blame the layman for being curious..and let's not forget the Scrooge's and goose and window comments and how someone may perceive how that load of garbage fits into the equation..
correct me if I'm wrong but didn't Paul say words to the effect to shareholders their money was in good hands and to show some trust..again correct me if I'm wrong but lending some of his money he had in imu to Macquarie to do as they wished with it kinda went against that statement..
Lesile..u have asked your long term holders to trust the science..that was some years ago..is it too much to ask u to show a little of that science..
again not suggesting anyone has done anything illegal but lets face it we all have differing levels when it comes to our moral compasses..
Paul..why not start up a new thread.. Why is IMU a mulitbagger again..
dyor..just my opinion and never advice
IMU Price at posting:
4.3¢ Sentiment: Buy Disclosure: Held
A personalised tool to help users track selected stocks. Delivering real-time notifications on price updates, announcements, and performance stats on each to help make informed investment decisions.
(20min delay)