Australia's largest stock trading and investment forum Australia's #1 stock forum

China reverses its ban on Australian wine, page-96

First 96 Last

Share
Profile

Follow
stayer

10,371 Posts.

218

24/10/23

12:52

Post #: 70504729
Share

Originally posted by Scott th Ratbag ↑

it's true that someone had to break rank first and open up. yet the consequences of peoples' lives/deaths were real as.

in terms of infection control, the lockdowns were necessary. Gladys was always weighing the business interests against the medical opinion.... both sides of the equation had valid points, but imo, infection control had to come first as businesses can;'t survive a pandemic that disables or kills so many so quickly..... in the end she made the choice after pussyfooting and allowed the virus out of control.

it is what it is.... now every state has aged care units having a higher rate of turnover.... so its good for their businesses too. too bad for the grieving families.

on the other hand, we spend too much time and effort keeping people alive at any cost for so much longer than a natural lifespan would dictate..... and then I'm grateful for medical advances when I had my first heart attack some 3 years ago. c'est la vie.

Expand

always respect you Scott though we often disagree!!
i am no antivaccer, but it is alarming at the high number of young people that had severe reactions, including death - I feel there is still stuff going on but 30's and 40's more so than 20's in age affected!
1 Upvote

Reply

Top Stories

CU6

Clarity progresses SECuRE trial with positive safety results

DXB

Dimerix begins recruiting young kidney disease patients in Mexico for Phase 3

GTR

GTI extends uranium mineralisation at Lo Hema through development drilling

3 stocks with antimony news on Thursday

SS1

Sun Silver confirms high-grade extension theory at Maverick Springs with 79.6 g/t intercept

There are more pages in this discussion • 1 more message in this thread...

First 96 Last