I have listened to him, and I can point out a number of extremely basic flaws in his presentation.
He makes the most basic of errors - logic, equivocation, assertion without evidence, which is delivered in an authoritarian bombastic style that is designed to dismiss opposition.
It's designed for believers, a means to bolster faith in the existence of a God. It has no merit.
Again, it is not logic, science or philosophy, it is faith.
Expand
