I wouldn't say he calls it evidence, he mainly just admits through logic and math that it's much more likely theres a creator of all things and the universe rather than everything just magically coming from nothing without any catalyst.
He may go on and say he's with the Christian faith but i think thats an extra step further than just realising it's far more likely that theres a creator of some description. If or when one comes to the conclusion that theres a Creator/God rather than absolutely nothing then the next logical step maywell be to look into the religions and or Bible/s and this account of human history.
