It can certainly look statistically significant, but I repeat, you cannot tell statistical significance merely looking at a graph. If you did an undergraduate statistics class (I did two fyi) and said the data was statistically significant because it looked statistically significant on a graph, you'd fail.
I don't know what the reason is. I'm happy to admit I don't know. But I'm not going to jump to any conclusions either. I suggest you conspiracy theorist do the same. Perhaps read the scientific paper that the doctor cited towards the end of that video. I doubt you will, and that's the difference between you and I.
Climate Change, page-381
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 697 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Add WHC (ASX) to my watchlist
 (20min delay)
|
|||||
|
Last
$7.09 |
Change
0.150(2.16%) |
Mkt cap ! $5.931B | |||
| Open | High | Low | Value | Volume |
| $7.00 | $7.17 | $6.99 | $56.08M | 7.917M |
Buyers (Bids)
| No. | Vol. | Price($) |
|---|---|---|
| 6 | 137399 | $7.08 |
Sellers (Offers)
| Price($) | Vol. | No. |
|---|---|---|
| $7.10 | 9407 | 2 |
View Market Depth
| Last trade - 16.10pm 27/09/2024 (20 minute delay) ? |
| WHC (ASX) Chart |