So this means they are applying a cap to each result that excludes the highest grade results, because they aren’t thought to be representative?
It is different to the cut-off grade that is applied to aggregated drill results across higher tonnages?
Perhaps someone with more understanding than me can comment!
The divergences between cut and uncut are significant. Presumably SPR is trying to be conservative in providing its results, but if the divergence is repeated across a meaningful sample size, does the interpretation start to move towards the higher grade numbers?
Ann: Spectacular new high-grade gold intercepts up to 1,093g/t, page-39
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 86 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Add SPR (ASX) to my watchlist
 (20min delay)
|
|||||
|
Last
$1.47 |
Change
0.095(6.91%) |
Mkt cap ! $1.627B | |||
| Open | High | Low | Value | Volume |
| $1.38 | $1.47 | $1.38 | $10.86M | 7.643M |
Buyers (Bids)
| No. | Vol. | Price($) |
|---|---|---|
| 5 | 3739 | $1.47 |
Sellers (Offers)
| Price($) | Vol. | No. |
|---|---|---|
| $1.48 | 70826 | 10 |
View Market Depth
| Last trade - 13.48pm 30/09/2024 (20 minute delay) ? |
| SPR (ASX) Chart |