''Ha ... it's not that simple. ''
calling for a ceasefire by the UN -------------- is simple, if members voted to do it
one calls for an 'unconditional ceasefire' for humanitarian reasons.
Do you have difficulty understanding what the word 'unconditional' means - if so, which part of the word gives you comprehension issues?
now as far as 'demands' for making ceasefires ----------- let us also get past the bullshit of that 'we don't negotiate with terrorists' -
because clearly - Israel does and America seems to like the idea - so, we can now all drop the bullshit.
Here's the news -------- any human with any amount of decency at all should be calling for a ceasefire from both sides and the evacuation of innocents ------
this is not a complicate concept
whether either side is prepared to do so, is a different issue as they have both displayed an atrocious level of behaviour and a total disregard for young and innocent lives.
my opinion is that the world would be a far better place without both of sides - and america could leave as well - but, that is not possible with such a flawed species. They should all depart the planet and take their all powerful gods with them - never to return
- Forums
- Political Debate
- Who wouldn't vote for a ceasefire?
Who wouldn't vote for a ceasefire?, page-81
Featured News
Featured News
The Watchlist
ACW
ACTINOGEN MEDICAL LIMITED
Dr. Steven Gourlay, CEO
Dr. Steven Gourlay
CEO
Previous Video
Next Video
SPONSORED BY The Market Online