BPH - PEP11 is back and this time it's different, page-970

@Justadabble
When you say "baseless" (71072810), let me introduce you to the base:

Mr JIHAD DIB said the following: "Thank you for the opportunity to speak about this matter. It is clear that there will be a response. The Minister has made it. I have gone through the importance and the value of what we have been saying about the application and the process. We are considering new legislation around the offshore area. If we can raise an issue around PEP 11, I know that the Minister has been working on it and has made her view on that very clear. I will leave it at that point." source: https://www.parliament.nsw.gov.au/Hansard/Pages/HansardResult.aspx#/docid/HANSARD-1323879322-137208

My "analysis" that you reference, simply suggests that they don't need to "consider new legislation" for the NOPTA process (100% true). In fact, considering new legislation can only be interpreted one way. In the context of a State Parliament which has just veto'd a bill in a committee, I believe this "consideration" of "new legislation" could be for inhibiting pipelines in NSW waters, what else could the new legislation be for?