the High Court Reasons, page-54

"way out of your depth". .. you wrote to bb1.... it perfectly describes your posts. desperate to fight your way out of the evidence that shows you're simply making stuff up with big words to present yourself as all-knowing. hahhehehaq. I laughed myself into a gag haq.

this is a legal argument/reasons presented by the Court that has the highest degree of integrity.... and you try to say its "pandering to woke nuances" hahahhe.... clearly you really are just trying it on.

you don't fool me or others.... only yourself.

now how about we get back to the OP..... do you deny the High Court has functioned according to constitutional laws? or are they merely "pandering"?