In the recent PAR008 release PAR management claimed that there was not just cartilage preservation but growth. This is unheard of in any OA medication study.
So why is there a lack of scientific or media interest?
Why is there a lack of exuberance in the AGM on this point?
Why is there an increase in short interest?
Why would non-executive directors leave?
Why the lack of peer review that has always been promised, for a number of years?
If the claim is....then why ?
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 26 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Add PAR (ASX) to my watchlist
 (20min delay)
|
|||||
|
Last
22.0¢ |
Change
0.000(0.00%) |
Mkt cap ! $76.95M | |||
| Open | High | Low | Value | Volume |
| 22.5¢ | 23.5¢ | 22.0¢ | $65.40K | 290.2K |
Buyers (Bids)
| No. | Vol. | Price($) |
|---|---|---|
| 13 | 96390 | 22.0¢ |
Sellers (Offers)
| Price($) | Vol. | No. |
|---|---|---|
| 23.5¢ | 138166 | 5 |
View Market Depth
| Last trade - 16.10pm 15/08/2024 (20 minute delay) ? |
| PAR (ASX) Chart |