Have Shareholders been mislead ?, page-77

Yeah your post was completely clueless, reckless, and pure speculation.

Let me explain carefully. You said that it appeared to you that there was a group of poster with with suspect motives/agendas. You speculated that they could be shorters hoping for a board spill. You couldn't be more wrong.

This group actually made the trip to Canada to visit NAL and several other sites, and talked to all the key players involved except James Brown who refused to meet with them or even to speak with any of them on the phone.

They talk about their trip here:

https://hotcopper.com.au/threads/north-american-lithium-revisit.7616150/

After visiting the sites and talking to all the key players, this group had a careful and serious discussion. They came to the conclusion that the board had to be removed.

The board had literally sabotaged Sayona's best chance at becoming a chemical producer and joining the likes of SQE, Livent, and Allkem because it was scared of a little debt financing.

Meanwhile, the whiskey crowd, including @Rupfel, @wandgirl, and @whiskey49 still have not given us a good reason for why the board should remain in place, and why James Brown should continue as Sayona's CEO despite his conflict of interest, lack of vested stake, his continual failure to be in compliance, and his long history as a mediocre CEO.