How can the Kingia pay zone not be as thick as expected heading west when both SE-2 and SE-3 have net pay and gross gas columns almost identical to SE-1?
SE-1 : 14m net 52m gross
SE-2 : 16m net 45 gross
SE -3 : 13m net 54 gross
The only difference is the porosity of the reservoir is slightly lower in the western edge of the field ~2%
The goal of these last 2 wells has been to test the continuity of the field to the west of the oblique fault to see whether both sides are connected.
Ann: SE3 confirms continuity at South Erregulla, page-245
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 63 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Add STX (ASX) to my watchlist
 (20min delay)
|
|||||
|
Last
21.0¢ |
Change
0.000(0.00%) |
Mkt cap ! $601.7M | |||
| Open | High | Low | Value | Volume |
| 21.0¢ | 21.5¢ | 20.5¢ | $1.313M | 6.260M |
Buyers (Bids)
| No. | Vol. | Price($) |
|---|---|---|
| 11 | 592504 | 21.0¢ |
Sellers (Offers)
| Price($) | Vol. | No. |
|---|---|---|
| 21.5¢ | 748432 | 9 |
View Market Depth
| Last trade - 16.10pm 18/10/2024 (20 minute delay) ? |
| STX (ASX) Chart |