I’ve always tried to quantify my position when the jab topic has come up with people who I don’t know very well/haven’t already known their position on the novel treatments.
As I have never thought openly challenging their beliefs/sanity is a polite way to begin a conversation
I have always started from a position that they should be doing what they think is right for them because that’s what I’ve done!
I didn’t choose to be a non compliant person just to be difficult, I chose my position because it was the obvious choice for me based on my life experience and small amount of knowledge of viruses, vaccines and what was supposed to be best practices for testing novel medical treatments.
It has proven (to me anyway) to be a very good safeguard against the ignorant non thinking types as most of them have tried to twist my views and belittle me with the standard “What medical degree have you got “ type jibes.
To them, any opinion or suggestion of doing one’s own Due diligence is the mark of a conspiracy theorist and I’m fine with that.
As it has given me a chance to point out just how many of my theories are now, accepted mainstream knowledge (even to them) and it seems that most of my loopy opinions only stay loopy for about 6 months.
I also try to be very gentle with the way that I remind them of their positions from 6-12 months ago
Unless they are the types that need a good shiv in the ribs with a good Oliver!
Those types of people, I give the wide blade with plenty of twists and I almost feel ashamed of myself for taunting and teasing them so blatantly but it’s just so satisfying on a base level.
