I disagree. In general retorting back with emotionally based counter points and quips that do not provide meaningful words to the evidence or the question being asked is not productive, it's an argument.
It may work on the public but expressing feelings does not kick goals for driving home attempts to establish facts.
- Forums
- Political Debate
- Higgins vs Lihrmann
Higgins vs Lihrmann, page-1176
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 1,259 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Featured News
TLX
Telix jumps 11.6% as US government indicates proposed medicare changes won't affect prostate cancer drug
SKS
SKS Technologies wins US$90M award to supply power to international hyperscale data centre in Melbourne
RNU
Renascor wins a funding boost given it wants to produce a critical mineral – but $5M award pales in comparison to some
Featured News
TLX
Telix jumps 11.6% as US government indicates proposed medicare changes won't affect prostate cancer drug
FWD
Queensland's housing crisis an opportunity for ASX builder Fleetwood – and taxpayer cash a safe harbour from the storm