Share
165 Posts.
lightbulb Created with Sketch. 70
clock Created with Sketch.
19/12/23
16:19
Share
Originally posted by Flambeau:
↑
If what you are proposing is true, that means AVZ was willing to waste the Supreme Court's time, not to win the case but to delay their opponent. If what you are saying is true, they would be wasting tax payer's money (funding the court), they would be wasting shareholder's money and they would not be a model litigant. That behaviour (if true) would only add to the pattern of what could be seen as deceptive conduct. I don't think your theory helps in this instance.
Expand
Another flog who chooses to engage in one-sided discussion and highlight only Fat Tail / MMGA narratives. Ignore this fool. Will wait for your response of "Don't shoot the messenger, I'm just trying to point out facts" and will ignore that too. AVZ has been in suspension for 18mths. There should only be long term holders and long term shorters, nobody new.