Record year, page-113

  1. 9,293 Posts.
    lightbulb Created with Sketch. 512
    Whozat, where you find denial of science, first you find a conspiracy theory to justify it.

    i don't think the words of a disgruntled ex-NOAA staffer invalidates the work of the agency. Were you to read why the agency revises its datasets, you could only conclude that's reasonable.

    but in the time honoured tradition of the denier of anthropogenic climate change, cherry picking and anecdotes are very much part of the flimsy foundation of denial.

    the cherry picking of course extends to met agencies. To support his opinion, Whozat says today that NOAA meteorologists bad and are conspiring to dodge up their numbers, Qld govt meteorologists good. This of course is subject to change without notice.

    Whozat, NOAA said in its November global climate report last week that for the eighth consecutive month, global ocean surface temperatures set a record high.

    if your personal beliefs deny what is objectively true about the world, as per Neil,deGrasse Tyson's quote below, then they're more accurately called personal delusions.

    welcome to denial of anthropogenic climate change, probably Australia's most popular pet pseudoscience these days. And it still doesn't have a leg to stand on.


    https://hotcopper.com.au/data/attachments/5834/5834719-b646a039b42e03e25642ed58c838cdfa.jpg

 
arrow-down-2 Created with Sketch. arrow-down-2 Created with Sketch.