Share
clock Created with Sketch.
01/01/24
22:30
Share
Originally posted by pintohoo
↑
I think that's a valid and important point ------------- not only did they not go with a trading scheme - but, they used denial as a mechanism for justification
and that's a huge problem - because it brought about all these wacko followers who fell in line for the denial gig
one could have accepted that they didn't bring in a trading scheme because of some kind of political belief or such -
but, to deny climate change outright ------------ was the height of stupidity ------------- we see here now - right on hc and social media
that these particular kinds of stupid people --------------- still think that there's no change - even though weather extremes are hitting us in the face all over the world - in growing numbers -----------
and it's been mentioned time and time over and graphs, charts and data put up as substation time and time and time over -
yet the idiots ask for substantiation every time -----------
the boofhead sailor in FNQ just asked 'who says we are in an El Nino?'
it's been discussed for weeks - references by NOAA, Bom, and god knows who else have been posted ----------- yet, these idiots ask
'who says'
there is stupid ----------- and there are particular kinds of stupid
somehow they either miss all the news - or disregard all the news - all the scientific findings and opinions and or think that it's all a big conspiracy -
they are truly amazing critters --------- unfortunately no one stopped them before they could lay eggs
Expand
"the boofhead sailor in FNQ just asked 'who says we are in an El Nino?'
it's been discussed for weeks - references by NOAA, Bom, and god knows who else have been posted ----------- yet, these idiots ask 'who says'
Well it sure doesn't seem like it.
Quite the opposite in fact.
Now why is that?
Did the CC boofheads at the BOM get it wrong .... again?