Okay so people have requested I respond to their posts. They have suggested they "hit me up" and I fail to respond to them, particularly in situations where I am called out for inaccuracies or there is a want for me to respond to negative comments. I have now read yours, and do identify with your sentiment that not all posts here are of substance.
You did ask me to read your posts in search of what you suggested was I believe a crisp $50 bill for posts that weren't fully supportive of Imugene.
Ok so I did look through some of your posts as suggested. Some snippets are found here:POST 1. Were you aiming this at the TA thread?
I don't care but those TA folk often get snitty about non-TA related post there. Just saying.
POST 2. except to say you probably picked the worst place in the world to post an anti-vax sentiment.
POST 3. Gee there's a lot of entitlement on show around these threads recently ... so ... one line responses are 'not tolerated' ???
I can only add a ;Harumph to you sir/madam'
,,, there ... a 3 line response. OK?
POST 4. Well, at least mentioning 'Imugene' keeps that post on topic but ... wtf?
POST 5. Don't worry Louise it's an old tradition on this thread to point to the (meaningless) movements on the US OTC market.
Footsnort kept it up for years until the penny (dime?) dropped.
Post a selectively-cropped graph or two and you'll feel right at home here.
POST 6. "Just a suggestion where the subject of a thread is very personal and fragile"
Just a suggestion ... material of a very personal or tragic nature does not belong on a share-trading forum ... or if it does, why not take it off to an existing thread like the 'Dearly departed ...' ?
Here's another thought - if you reckon it does belong here, maybe create a new thread called 'Material Of A Very Personal Or Fragile Nature' ?
Post 7. That didn't age well. Next time wait until 4:30. Not financial advice, temporal advice only. DYOR.
Post 8. Thank you for that (as usual) nice wrap but I stopped reading at the missing apostrophe in ‘Yuman Fongs’*
* unless of course he’s a twin
Post 9. Look at any 5 recent pages from the ‘bagger’ thread and imagine you needed to guess the thread title … could be anything from ‘Sad Story about my uncle’ to ‘Xmas Kringle ideas’ to ‘We’re all going to be RICH!!!!’. Right?
Post 10. ‘should have followed up’ ?
…implies that it’s my job or or that I have some other responsibility to equip a new thread for it’s new life or death.
In conclusion all l I found was sarcastic, cynical dribble that from what I can see is liked by and therefore appreciated by little or no one on these threads. I suggest perhaps Reddit, maybe parts of TikTok or possibly a few groups on Facebook suited to your skillset, if I could refer to it as that. Maybe there are some on X who even enjoy your attempts to put down, demean or at times crush other posters.
Who feels put down, demeaned or crushed by posters such as you? Guess what, people like me, who write a substantive post that is clearly of relevance to the majority of interested people on this thread, that is called out for not including one apostrophe in the applicable place. As psychotherapist Terry Real writes, “sarcasm is the indirect expression of
anger.” There is nothing the listener can do with it." Well in this instance I am calling it out for what it is, and you out for who you are, a sarcastic, cynical human being. Psychology today notes t
here's no growth in cynicism."The complicated subtext of communications limits self-exposure and psychological movement, depriving you of honest feedback from others."Well guess what, on this thread I hold dear,
we do want honest feedback from others, and I am going to do whatever I can to fight for and protect it. If you have offended me along the way through your own contrite miserable existence on these threads, I can only imagine how many others you have offended. If HC is incapable of calling out pathetic school yard bullies such as you, perhaps it's high time posters like me did.
Whether or not your posts are meant to be funny, or whether they are supportive or non supportive of Imugene is not the point here, to me that appears irrelevant. What seems relevant is that your pointed sarcasm and prevailing cynicism is not supportive of the goodwill presented by the majority of posters on this and other IMU threads.
Goodbye
WMHB
