Climate Change, page-693

I wont take it personally, but dont you think its a bit strange that Haga posted a source, then I destroyed it with some pretty simple logic, then he ignored my response? It's not the fact that he ignored my response that destroyed his source that bothers me, its the cognitive dissonance, the doubling down without evidence, the constant assertion that he is right. Its childish. This is a space for adults (I thought) to debate ideas. Asserting facts without evidence is laughable and would get you thrown out of court quicker than you can say "objection!"

I'll ask this genuinely to you; Did you read Hagas source the other week, then did you read my rebuttal of it? if so, what did you think? I take the time to read anything people post here, whether I agree with it or not, I give everyone that courtesy.