In M-2 they intersected an unexpected 163m thick shale body, and that was apparently a complete surprise at the time. Maybe you were not following the IVZ operations at that time?
M-2 UA in comparison with M-1, was definitely not thin cyclical shale/sands. They were expecting from the seismic DHI's thicker gas bearing sands in the Upper Angwa in M-2, but when the samples were taken and after provisional log interpretation was performed, they only found 13.9m net pay.
Phone conversation with Scott - Jan 12th 2023., page-209
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 336 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
