Forgive my simplistic application of this logic - If I'm wrong and stand to be corrected please do so - however a reduction in value of Li mineral prices should result over time in a drop in cost of production of EV cars, which should then translate to the cost of EV vehicles coming down? Is that too simple a take?
Would that in turn generate a governmental push to promote EV uptake through parallel supports/tax incentives etc? I certainly don't disagree that based on a current combination of niche pricing and Australia's appetite for large ute vehicles, its no doubt resulting in slower than projected uptake.
It appears to be a litany of competing beliefs, governments, and the free market 101.
Do we not simply apply the 'putting it in the bottom draw' until circumstances change? Changes what would have been a quick win, into what the norm is typically with minerals and resources, which is a long term play when ALL conditions benefit that material and use.
Cheers
- Forums
- ASX - By Stock
- WC8
- Chart
WC8
wildcat resources limited
Add to My Watchlist
8.33%
!
16.5¢

Chart, page-391
Featured News
Add to My Watchlist
What is My Watchlist?
A personalised tool to help users track selected stocks. Delivering real-time notifications on price updates, announcements, and performance stats on each to help make informed investment decisions.
|
|||||
Last
16.5¢ |
Change
-0.015(8.33%) |
Mkt cap ! $220.5M |
Open | High | Low | Value | Volume |
18.0¢ | 18.5¢ | 16.0¢ | $1.032M | 6.121M |
Buyers (Bids)
No. | Vol. | Price($) |
---|---|---|
3 | 41783 | 16.5¢ |
Sellers (Offers)
Price($) | Vol. | No. |
---|---|---|
17.0¢ | 140000 | 4 |
View Market Depth
No. | Vol. | Price($) |
---|---|---|
2 | 35946 | 0.165 |
29 | 2033271 | 0.160 |
9 | 428646 | 0.155 |
17 | 401431 | 0.150 |
6 | 423778 | 0.145 |
Price($) | Vol. | No. |
---|---|---|
0.170 | 140000 | 4 |
0.175 | 110590 | 5 |
0.180 | 606000 | 3 |
0.185 | 99992 | 3 |
0.190 | 17000 | 1 |
Last trade - 16.10pm 29/07/2025 (20 minute delay) ? |
Featured News
WC8 (ASX) Chart |