Wooooo Hooooo Go BPH :)$$$$$$, page-17428

Fitzhume,

No laws to prevent renewal. If declined and go's to federal court.

The judge would most certainly be interested in why Santos and woodside are getting renewals and may determine bias there alone.

State laws I doubt would come into play because the targeted drill is 26km from shore in federal waters.

The courts would also be critical on why it took over 1 year to decline if it occurs.

The courts may find that unconsiable. Ie lack of good conscience.

Ramifications if an honour finds this, is severe, often can result in harsh penalties.

The court can impose a tight time in orders, especially if the 1 year to make a decision is invalid.

If we look at the way some detainees are held long term without charge, an effective prison sentence that only courts can impose the mind boggles.

Then throw in morrison sneaking into portfolios. Not illegal at the time, but unconsiable conduct.

So it does not matter if Labour or Liberal are governing, then throw in the teals, who all recieved financial backing, staff and training from holmes a court.

Whom has renewable interests, and that was not disclosed to voters pre the election of the teals.

Also many had Labour links, again not disclosed.

So the agenda I question.

I think the delay hear is political. Not so flash because all Australians ultimately will pay the price.

Government answer, we will rebate against the bills, but that's not fixing the core system.

To easy to just splash the cash.