So your (changing) thesis is now that ALB knew back then what has only just been published by WMcK and you are saying that that is why ALB decided to not go ahead with their proposal.
But previously you were saying that the board should have not rejected an “offer”. Have you now recognised that fragility of that original thesis?
So help me to understand how genuine and useful your contributions are here (and on all the other threads in which you post), which is your thesis? Or are you just making it up as you go along?
Ann: Liontown rejects Indicative Proposal from Albemarle, page-980
Add LTR (ASX) to my watchlist
 (20min delay)
|
|||||
|
Last
$1.04 |
Change
-0.045(4.15%) |
Mkt cap ! $2.521B | |||
| Open | High | Low | Value | Volume |
| $1.07 | $1.08 | $1.04 | $10.81M | 10.31M |
Buyers (Bids)
| No. | Vol. | Price($) |
|---|---|---|
| 33 | 339507 | $1.04 |
Sellers (Offers)
| Price($) | Vol. | No. |
|---|---|---|
| $1.05 | 120794 | 2 |
View Market Depth
| Last trade - 16.10pm 14/06/2024 (20 minute delay) ? |
|
|||||
|
Last
$1.05 |
Change
-0.045 ( 4.12 %) |
||||
| Open | High | Low | Volume | ||
| $1.06 | $1.08 | $1.04 | 2904342 | ||
| Last updated 16.00pm 14/06/2024 ? | |||||
| LTR (ASX) Chart |