Ann: Resignation of Chief Financial Officer, page-20

If you really want to continue the discussion...

twoapples did make generic commentary based on the statistics they posted above - which are also the statistics you retrospectively relied upon to explain why you were operating off public information / general research and are not an insider/connected to an insider.

The problem is that if you go back and read your initial post, it did not relate to general statistics. You made a very specific claim (becoming an ex-Blackwoods club) about a very specific employee (the EGM of the Trade segment). I think it's obvious to all that this is not information at the tip of people's fingers with a Google search. In fact, the research to trawl linkedin (unassisted by an org chart) to determine this is quite an elaborate and painful task. Research is part of what I do for a living, I'm pretty adept at it, and I can see these aren't easy dots to join without the benefit of information from the inside.

When challenged, you said you got all this from general information and turnover statistics. Yeah. ok. Even more suspicious. These aren't KMP we're talking about.

Further, the post I refer to above - first post for a new user on a forum that's not overly active on hotcopper.

Seen it before, and will see it again. I maintain my view, and I think most that go back objectively and read your first post would be suspicious of the specificity of your comments, and the clumsy attempt at explaining it away. I think we'd all be better off if you'd admit it - as I said before, it increases the credibility of your posts, so I don't see the reason for not clearing it up.