The way, the truth, and the life – Jesus Christ, page-1354 - HotCopper | ASX Share Prices, Stock Market & Share Trading Forum

Originally posted by wotsup ↑

You were the one that said the "I" in 1:14 is the I AM and the I AM is Jesus and before this you have flesh = Jesus = the results of YOUR delusions is, Jesus is going to dwell in I AM = Jesus.
Jesus dwelling in himself =

Even the Interlinear with corrupted English words say -> And the Word flesh became and NOT this corruption of yours -> "
The Word became flesh"
That is an entirely different context and meaning.

The Word flesh became = Word flesh (already existing) became (onto the scene) -> and made his dwelling.

Where the HEC are you getting all those CORRUPTED words from for 1:14????????????????????????
NO WAY are they in the Interlinear.

Face the CLEAR TRUTH, YOU cannot address the words "to become" and "I" and YOU NEED to do so with credibility.
1:14, NO question about it, it IS a prophesy to come about and zero to do with the word becoming flesh, you lot have been caught out, with your pants down around your ankles, BIG time.
The crazy part about it, your own link showed, the two Greek versions of the word, as per our English -> become and to become.
Become was clearly past, happened and to become was future, to happen.
They tried at first to say, they could be interchanged = no bloody way can they, and they fessed up to this lie, near the end of the link, which clearly flew by your Cookoo's nest.

"
are the "proposed" words
"
Proposed words all right, but don't insult God and Jesus by falsely claiming they are scripture, they are NO more than tradition of man, which we are warned to watch out for, test the spirit/words and yours FAIL.

Expand

Even the Interlinear with corrupted English words say -> And the Word flesh became and NOT this corruption of yours -> "The Word became flesh"
That is an entirely different context and meaning.

Oh for heaven’s sake wotsup, your cluelessness is shining brighter then the sun, and you expect people to take notice of what you are saying, have you ever read Chinese or Ikea instruction, obviously not.

Not knowing why, the above is written as it is only provers that in no uncertain terms you haven’t got the basic understand of how to read anything especially something that is 2000 years old.

This verse and all the verses has already been translated to what it means in today’s mindset as to when it was written
Boy you should checkout the OT to see how its was written.

These are the basics off it all, I hope I covered everything so your brain can work around it and understand

Translating from one language to another, particularly when dealing with a language that is 2000 years old, can be challenging for several reasons:

Linguistic Differences: Languages evolve and change over time, which means that the grammar, vocabulary, and sentence structure of a language spoken 2000 years ago may differ significantly from modern languages. This can make it difficult to find exact equivalents for words and phrases, leading to potential loss or alteration of meaning during translation.

Cultural Context: Languages are deeply intertwined with the cultures that produce them. Translators must understand the cultural context in which a language was used to accurately convey the intended meaning. However, with the passage of time, cultural references, idioms, and metaphors may become obsolete or difficult to interpret. This can lead to challenges in capturing the full depth of meaning in older texts.

Contextual Ambiguity: Context is crucial in interpreting and translating texts. However, when translating from an ancient language, important contextual cues may be lost or not fully understood. This can result in ambiguity or multiple interpretations, making it challenging to determine the precise meaning of certain passages.

Lack of Direct Equivalents: Every language has its own unique vocabulary that may not have direct equivalents in another language. This can create difficulties in finding appropriate translations, especially when dealing with abstract concepts or culturally specific words. Translators must make choices based on the closest approximations available, which may not always capture the full nuance of the original text.

Translator Bias: Translators inevitably bring their own background, culture, and biases into the translation process. This can influence their understanding and interpretation of the original text. Differences in theological beliefs, linguistic preferences, or cultural perspectives can affect the way a text is translated, potentially leading to variances in meaning and interpretation.

Given these challenges, translating from a language as old as 2000 years requires expertise, careful analysis of the available resources, and a deep understanding of both the source and target languages. It is an intricate process that involves making informed decisions and weighing the available evidence to convey the intended meaning as accurately as possible.

And then Jesus spoke Aramaic not Greek