Ann: Quarterly Activities Report - December 2023, page-59

I’m not sure why you refuse to (or cannot?) comprehend the most basic of language/logic concepts?
You can speculate all you like about why they did not mention the grade of recent production.
But you didn’t; you said:
“If it [grade] was consistent of [or?] higher, I'm certain it wouldn't have been omitted.”
The basic fact remains that you simply cannot be CERTAIN of this, as you clearly stated.
All I did was point out that such a statement is actual nonsense.
It’s very simple.
You are not certain of this, because there is no way - unless you have info that has not been released to the market - that you can possibly be certain.
Don’t play dumb; it’s a very simple and clear concept.
btw it’s not a huge deal, but the fact that yourself (and frenchy) are stubbornly doubling down on it is very strange and somewhat concerning.
Frenchy, iirc, did essentially exactly the same things months ago and it was proven to be wrong, despite his “logic” being almost identical to yours.
Have you forgotten the first rule of holes?
The strong emotive language chosen is purposeful isn’t it? Good for seeding FUD!

The filtration circuit guidance was that a schedule was developed to sort it and increase production during Q1. Simple. Again, what specifically suggests “limited progress” with this work, in comparison to prior guidance? Simplistic generalisations like “they've been working on these issues for over six months now without success” do not address this point, yet that is all you can put forward in response…? Wow.

Your post clearly had the intention, imo, of seeding “they are hiding poor grade data” and “filtration circuit progress is sh!t”, but it has been far from convincing. These are both claims/views/conclusions that are effectively baseless. One has an almost identical precedent. It was wrong. The other appears to have been back-pedalled to an overall generalisation and not specific to today’s announcement whatsoever.
You’re dropping the ball. Focus.