Are you blind or just deluded, they looked upon, handled the scriptures as one does, you know the ones that Jesus said have the words of life in them.
1 John 1:1-2 is referencing Jesus as the one they have heard, seen, and touched, what problems are created when replacing Jesus with “Scripture” that they have heard, seen, and touched
Replacing Jesus with "Scripture" in 1 John 1:1-2 would create several problems:
I'll give you a clear explanation instead of your many gears going around your head to which no one can understand, I've made this simple so even a monkey can understand, even so I'm certain you will not Distortion of Meaning: The passage clearly refers to the disciples' personal experience with Jesus, emphasizing their direct contact with the incarnate Son of God. If "Scripture" was substituted, the intended meaning would be distorted because Scripture is not a person that can be heard, seen, or touched.
Denial of Jesus' Physicality: By replacing Jesus with "Scripture," it would deny the true physical existence of Jesus. The passage emphasizes the disciples' firsthand encounter with the physical presence of Christ, including hearing His voice, seeing Him with their eyes, and even touching Him. Distorting this reality undermines the biblical teachings on the incarnation and the bodily resurrection of Jesus.
Undermining the Authority of Scripture: While Scripture is God-breathed and essential for faith and practice, equating it with Jesus Himself could lead to placing Scripture above Jesus and His teachings. It may give an impression that Scripture holds a higher authority than the actual person of Jesus, which is contrary to Christian beliefs.
Disregard for the Historical Context: The passage in 1 John reflects the eyewitness testimony of the apostles and their experiences with Jesus during His earthly ministry. Replacing Jesus with "Scripture" would disregard the historical context and the specific events surrounding Jesus' life, ministry, and redemptive work, which are crucial for understanding the Gospel message.
In summary, substituting "Scripture" for Jesus in 1 John 1:1-2 creates theological and interpretational problems by distorting the meaning, denying Jesus' physicality, undermining the authority of Scripture, and disregarding the historical context surrounding the apostles' firsthand experience of Jesus.
***************** Plus
At the time of writing, John is speaking as an eyewitness and witness to Jesus' teachings, miracles, and resurrection. He is sharing the firsthand accounts of the apostles who had been with Jesus throughout His ministry.
Regarding the concept of scripture, it's important to understand that the New Testament writings, including 1 John, were not immediately recognized and considered scripture upon their completion. They were originally circulated as letters or writings within the early Christian community.
While the apostles were still alive, their words and teachings were trusted and accepted by the early believers as authoritative and inspired by God. Over time, as the church developed and faced theological challenges, these writings were recognized, collected, and eventually formed into the New Testament canon.
In 1 John 1:1-2, John is emphasizing the personal experience and authority of the apostles as they bear witness to Jesus Christ. They heard His teachings, they saw His miracles, and they even touched Him. These firsthand experiences formed the foundation of their teachings and eventually became part of the sacred writings - scripture we now know as the New Testament.
So, even though the New Testament writings were not yet formally compiled at the time of John's writing, he is highlighting the personal experiences of the apostles and their eyewitness testimony as the basis for their authority and the truth they were sharing.
Another Plus, your greatest error of all
By equating scriptures with the Word of Life you would indeed be a fundamental error because it would be placing the written text on the same level as Jesus, who is the living Word of God. While scripture is a source of revelation and contains the inspired words about Jesus, it is Jesus Himself who is the embodiment of the Word of Life.
In John 1:1, it is affirmed that "In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God." This refers to Jesus Christ's divine nature and eternal existence. Then, in verse 14, it states, "The Word became flesh and made his dwelling among us." This highlights the incarnation of Jesus, where He took on human form and dwelt among humanity.
Fundamental error would be to confuse or equate the written scriptures with Jesus Himself. Scripture points to Jesus and reveals His nature, teachings, and work, but it is not an equal substitute for Jesus.
It is crucial to recognize the distinction between the written words of scripture and the living presence of Jesus Christ. The scriptures bear witness to Jesus and guide us in understanding Him, but our ultimate focus and devotion should be on Jesus, the Word made flesh, who is the source of life and salvation.
