This is why I’m critical of the process and the way it has occurred with the court case. I feel that DB should be pushing more or at least should have at that time. Why agree to wait more after practically winning the case for the same process to occur in the exact same way as previously..
Also, do you believe option B is enough reason for rejection without previous bias? I haven’t seen any evidence of it happening but I wonder how likely that scenario would be..
If option A has been pre-selected we are fine. If it’s still sitting on a desk unopened, option B would still be possible for MK to handball?
BPH- PEP-11 JA DECISION TIMEFRAME, page-67
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 129 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Add BPH (ASX) to my watchlist
 (20min delay)
|
|||||
|
Last
1.8¢ |
Change
-0.001(5.26%) |
Mkt cap ! $20.65M | |||
| Open | High | Low | Value | Volume |
| 1.9¢ | 2.0¢ | 1.8¢ | $91.52K | 4.868M |
Buyers (Bids)
| No. | Vol. | Price($) |
|---|---|---|
| 9 | 1956600 | 1.8¢ |
Sellers (Offers)
| Price($) | Vol. | No. |
|---|---|---|
| 1.9¢ | 1000000 | 1 |
View Market Depth
| Last trade - 15.48pm 28/06/2024 (20 minute delay) ? |
| BPH (ASX) Chart |