"single people have been penalised for not being married & having kids:". ....... "penalised"? how so? this suggests you had to pay more than standard taxation in order to subsidise others.
families have much higher expenses than people with no kids. I've had 3 children and only ever received the old Child Endowment from Govt. so I don't know the benefits of child care allowance or Family Tax Benefits. yet I would not consider a single person with no kids as contributing to the costs of raising kids.
- Forums
- Political Debate
- S3TC analysis
S3TC analysis, page-13
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 19 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Featured News
Featured News
GML
Gateway Mining sells WA Eastern Montague gold project to Brightstar for $14M – half of that in shares
DVP
Commodity house Trafigura funds Develop Global's copper-zinc Woodlawn play with offtake deal in place