Li-related News/Articles/Reports, page-6410

JL is notorious for swiftly blocking anyone who dares to question his perspectives on X/Twitter, so why would I bother? Moreover, it's unnecessary to reach out to every individual expressing a flawed viewpoint. Instead, you can simply review other sources of information independently to form your own assessment. This part's important, because greater corroboration = greater probability.

I've reiterated multiple times (to you directly) that I reached out to JZ via email to directly enquire about the specific grade. His response was that they intentionally omitted it, previously including it solely for "marketing purposes," and he declined to disclose the precise number, vaguely stating it was "around" the previous figure. His evasiveness didn't instill confidence.

My stance is simply that Joe Lowry stands as an outlier and an unreliable source of information. You're trying to appear like you are on the fence about his views, but your combative demeanour suggests otherwise, implying a certain degree of consideration for his opinions. While you readily toss around accusations like "you seem indifferent to the facts," ironically, that appears to be your approach by failing to address the pricing assessment provided by FastMarkets.

So, I'll pose the same question that Pooh avoided – is JZ incorrect, or is JL?