I expected you to miss the point. Here it is again for your consumption. LOL
Clear enough for you without the adjacent contextualized contribution?
The assertion being tested is if he lied or did not lie - right? The test of the veracity of the allegation is the court - right? You aren't the court - right? Despite that, you rant endlessly without merit, because of the aforementioned. Getting the picture yet? Clear enough for you? Got it?? Hello!
If not, simply read the above as a mantra for a few weeks and get back to me with more questions.
Phew - its takes some a lifetime to digest the obvious. I'm happy to persevere with you as long as it takes, which I expect to be some time.
OK nice chatting in a weird sort of way.
- Forums
- ASX - By Stock
- SP1
- ASIC v ISX Hearing
ASIC v ISX Hearing, page-2548
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 960 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Featured News
Add SP1 (ASX) to my watchlist
Currently unlisted public company.
The Watchlist
LU7
LITHIUM UNIVERSE LIMITED
Alex Hanly, CEO
Alex Hanly
CEO
SPONSORED BY The Market Online