to save further arguement, all that we've received in our other key cases (AVZ v Cominiere; AVZ v Dathomir; and AVZ v DRC) is orders intended to uphold the status quo. The main body of those cases havent begun yet, so its misleading to suggest that AVZ's legal cases are "largely at a conclusion" when the meat of these cases havent even started yet.
Sure the early signs are promising, but the cases have not been heard yet. So lets be accurate, theres a long path to tread yet ahould we continue with the proceedings rather than reaching a negotiated outcome