Ok, so Albos wording in that article makes it more clear now;
Scomo stuffed up the application rejection because he did it BEFORE the environmental approval. I.e. Albos take is that you have to use the environmental process to kill it to be 'safe' from overturning on bias grounds. And he has to be referring to a rejection because what threat is there for a court case overturning an approval due to bias when hes on the record as being against Pep11?
So, 1, what potential grounds are there for nopsema denying the application? They need to find some super rare hairy breasted bottle nose shark whose habitat is at the drill site. That takes time...
But more importantly, 2, Albo has telegraphed his strategy, clearly showing his continuing bias, which support why King (either for or against) hasn't approved after all this time, despite saying a long time approval process wouldn't be fair.
- Forums
- ASX - By Stock
- BPH
- Wooooo Hooooo Go BPH :)$$$$$$
Wooooo Hooooo Go BPH :)$$$$$$, page-19543
-
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 15,454 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Featured News
Add BPH (ASX) to my watchlist
(20min delay)
|
|||||
Last
1.3¢ |
Change
0.000(0.00%) |
Mkt cap ! $15.67M |
Open | High | Low | Value | Volume |
1.2¢ | 1.3¢ | 1.2¢ | $6.111K | 500.8K |
Buyers (Bids)
No. | Vol. | Price($) |
---|---|---|
5 | 1023028 | 1.2¢ |
Sellers (Offers)
Price($) | Vol. | No. |
---|---|---|
1.3¢ | 1620833 | 12 |
View Market Depth
No. | Vol. | Price($) |
---|---|---|
5 | 1023028 | 0.012 |
38 | 10587123 | 0.011 |
40 | 12032238 | 0.010 |
22 | 6516827 | 0.009 |
11 | 2834618 | 0.008 |
Price($) | Vol. | No. |
---|---|---|
0.013 | 1620833 | 12 |
0.014 | 374000 | 2 |
0.015 | 570499 | 3 |
0.016 | 1465001 | 1 |
0.017 | 1042880 | 4 |
Last trade - 16.10pm 02/10/2024 (20 minute delay) ? |
Featured News
BPH (ASX) Chart |