Wooooo Hooooo Go BPH :)$$$$$$, page-19616

I am not aware of any changes..

I am very confident that NOPTA have given the tick of approval. They must have as the JA would have come straight out and declined. As such. difficult to decline based on the merits of the application and the process and procedure.

I lean towards what@TradingStocks states. ie the decsion will be water tight, clear in the reasons and reasoning as to why PEP-11 has been approved.

THe decsion wont be subject to appeal.

If the decsion is negative, I have no doubt ths will be back in court. THe Government wil find it very difficult to argue a case whereby their decsion is without bias, nor political.

IF the Deferal government do follow the law and adhere to the process and protocol, PEP-11 will be approved.

ON a side note, Albanese did not correct the journalist when he claims BPH had moved the project to federal waters.

Albanese would only be briefed on PEP-11 to the point where he can answer some questions and looks somewhat intelligent. This man must have so much on his plate. I would not consider PEP-11 high on his list.

MK has further approvals to process. She has not refused one. My understanding is that with our Westminster System, the relevent minister is responsible for decsions of their portfolio. Albonese cant interfere too much, again, grounds for cause of action. NOPTA has approved, no doubt, how can MK go against this process that is intended to ensure applications are vetted, checked and adhere to policy and guidelines?

People in Vic still without power. Only source of energy is gas.