Share
2,387 Posts.
lightbulb Created with Sketch. 417
clock Created with Sketch. 01/03/24
14:48
Share
Originally posted by jlo2012:
↑
You have no idea what you are talking about. lol did you just make up the term "documentary evidence" to sounds like you do? haha. Are you talking about a document being tendered as opposed to a witness giving oral evidence? What are you trying to say? It does highlight though your misunderstanding when saying ASIC had only one witness in relation to 15% issue. You do realise that the ASIC investigator gave brief evidence and that a tonne of document exhibits were handed up and tendered through him? He was used as a vehicle to introduce that bundle of evidence. For example, the Martyn Jacobs research notes that relate to the 15% issue. They were introduced as part of that bundle and are evidence before His Honour. This is just but one small example. The transcripts don't tell the full story.
Expand
This posts conclusion only highlights the gravity of your misunderstanding of the opportunity you preached in the years leading into the short report. How did you get it so wrong? (according to your now best guess theory).
