ASIC v ISX Hearing, page-2870

You must of missed my obviously not so apparent point.

With the sublime spreadsheet analysis, completed with the utmost integrity, I was simply asking why he missed what now appears to be controversial and in particular the revenue question, which was published prior to the 'articulated analysis'. Why if being so "bloody smart" as you've lovingly assessed, was that missed as a now an obvious issue being pounded endlessly now?

Does that make sense now?

I don't think we need to get defensive, just respond to a simple question.

Him having your respect is not compelling to me or others I suspect, but naturally they are free to voice their own opinion as they've done previously and you, yours for what its worth.