yes but no mention of 'material'
I suspect that mgmt tried to imply its material in relation to being an adjacent sector, but as shareholders, we saw that as material revenues (especially when you start quoting the amount of cables etc etc).
I'm speculating, but I suspect if they have just said this is what we have signed, and no reference to material anything, the ASX had no cause to penalise them (it seems a legitimate update to make to the market.......the core of the issue is all of us assuming it will materially lift earnings, and there is no evidence in terms of signed contracts etc with definative numbers that can point to that)
- Forums
- ASX - By Stock
- AVA
- Ann: H1 FY2024 Results Announcement
Ann: H1 FY2024 Results Announcement, page-33
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 11 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Featured News
BOE
Uranium prices on the NYMEX are stable, but ASX uranium stocks are sinking on Friday. The answer lies in Kazakhstan
NEWS
Week 31 Wrap: JORC rules to get tougher; RBA rate hike chance 50/50; US Fed Sept cut still the quo
NEU
Neuren Pharmaceuticals dips after pediatric Angelman Syndrome Phase 2 trial results fail to impress
NEWS
Is oil undervalued?
Add AVA (ASX) to my watchlist
|
|||||
Last
10.5¢ |
Change
0.000(0.00%) |
Mkt cap ! $30.39M |
Open | High | Low | Value | Volume |
11.5¢ | 11.5¢ | 10.5¢ | $893 | 8.503K |
Buyers (Bids)
No. | Vol. | Price($) |
---|---|---|
8 | 274597 | 10.5¢ |
Sellers (Offers)
Price($) | Vol. | No. |
---|---|---|
11.5¢ | 199756 | 2 |
View Market Depth
No. | Vol. | Price($) |
---|---|---|
8 | 274597 | 0.105 |
10 | 182230 | 0.100 |
3 | 30408 | 0.098 |
1 | 320 | 0.095 |
1 | 10999 | 0.091 |
Price($) | Vol. | No. |
---|---|---|
0.115 | 199756 | 2 |
0.120 | 27512 | 2 |
0.125 | 49999 | 1 |
0.130 | 142324 | 4 |
0.135 | 303831 | 6 |
Last trade - 16.10pm 09/08/2024 (20 minute delay) ? |
Featured News
AVA (ASX) Chart |