what reason do you need?, page-20

Welcome back Mcdownrampit.

We have missed you.

It's great that you have come back with a new fact.
Oh wait, it's the same old fact that you repeatedly post over and over again. lol

I see you have a new point.

From this aspect, Cue could offer a better chance as 70% of its value is already covered by current production as opposed to Meo?s Tassie shoals? or those NT/68 were not deemed to be attractive enough to hold the SP when Artemis is a dry.


28 Feb 09 (GFC) MEO. 7.4c
28.Feb 09 (GFC) CUE. 10.3c. And yet CUE had an income of $20m.

Mmmmmmmmm. That's interesting, isn't it.

Looking forward to more wonderful points.
Lets see if you can post with out the only fact you have.