He was wrong. By your own link, he claimed it wasn’t a safe seat, despite all historical data suggesting it was. And low and behold it was a safe seat, and it was retained within margin.
You’re failing miserably here because you know you’re attempting to use a specious argument on a far small subset of data against a macro historical data set. You’re wrong, deal with it, move on. Stop crowing early
- Forums
- Political Debate
- Dunkley byelection
Dunkley byelection, page-739
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 16 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Featured News
Featured News
The Watchlist
LU7
LITHIUM UNIVERSE LIMITED
Alex Hanly, CEO
Alex Hanly
CEO
SPONSORED BY The Market Online