Associated News, page-2943

This is what’s annoy me a tad. Fair enough Ni needs to be $20k for QPM to be profitable, forecast for 2026-27 (supposedly when refinery is to be completed, yes I understand it was meant to be 2025) is substantially more than todays price. Would/should they not be moving forward based on forecast numbers and not todays price? And to bring it up again, ARU is a great example of that, NdPr approx $50, which is most recent lows, yet they can somehow justify moving forward based on forecasted numbers. Sorry, but I just don’t buy it, sounds like an excuse and has to be something much more to it imo.