In the context of the court case, the law says you can't pre-determine your decision (bias)
In the context of a NOPTA application, the most weight is to be given to the advice from NOPTA, they are the regulator and the experts.
To go against the NOPTA advice, the JA must have valid grounds to reject the advice.
Public Interest alone is NOT sufficient grounds.
So, given the above, what else could the JA take issue with that would stand up to scrutiny in a court of law?
Keith Pitt didn't believe there were any grounds for denying the application.
Wooooo Hooooo Go BPH :)$$$$$$, page-22521
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 12,844 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Add BPH (ASX) to my watchlist
 (20min delay)
|
|||||
|
Last
1.4¢ |
Change
0.001(7.69%) |
Mkt cap ! $17.03M | |||
| Open | High | Low | Value | Volume |
| 1.2¢ | 1.4¢ | 1.2¢ | $26.92K | 2.096M |
Buyers (Bids)
| No. | Vol. | Price($) |
|---|---|---|
| 4 | 1141667 | 1.2¢ |
Sellers (Offers)
| Price($) | Vol. | No. |
|---|---|---|
| 1.4¢ | 854042 | 4 |
View Market Depth
| Last trade - 16.10pm 06/11/2024 (20 minute delay) ? |
| BPH (ASX) Chart |