re: the proof (tadtarga) sorry Student this is all bullsh!t I have never seen a valuation done in this ar$e about way. There is simply not enough information on the table to put a value on it, but the information and calculations we have seen are flawed. As tastarga said the NPV is not multiplied by a PE factor. A PE multiple applies to earnings, not NPV. This expert may know something about geochemistry but he has mixed and matched valuation methods which quite simply, cannot be blended.
the proof, page-56
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 24 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Add ADY (ASX) to my watchlist
 (20min delay)
|
|||||
|
Last
1.0¢ |
Change
0.000(0.00%) |
Mkt cap ! $16.29M | |||
| Open | High | Low | Value | Volume |
| 1.0¢ | 1.0¢ | 1.0¢ | $3.972K | 397.2K |
Buyers (Bids)
| No. | Vol. | Price($) |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1592171 | 1.0¢ |
Sellers (Offers)
| Price($) | Vol. | No. |
|---|---|---|
| 1.1¢ | 662260 | 2 |
View Market Depth
| Last trade - 13.13pm 13/09/2024 (20 minute delay) ? |
| ADY (ASX) Chart |