Australia's largest stock trading and investment forum Australia's #1 stock forum

I told you it was, page-7

First 7 Last

Share
Profile

Follow
Scott th Ratbag

58,116 Posts.

664

28/03/24

14:27

Post #: 73105433
Share

Originally posted by pugsley100: ↑

I seriously doubt this has any validity....

It's more to do with households rather than individuals and the amount of tax a household pays and benefits they receive.

For many households that will vary as the particular "household" passes through time.

A household in child bearing years might get more assistance associated with raising and educating the kids but when the kids grow up the parent household might move into net payers until they get old and start using more of the health care services.

Expand

but do these benefits exceed the quantum of tax they pay?
Upvote

Reply

Top Stories

ILU

Rare earths stocks surge as Pentagon buys big stake in US REE miner

Listen: HotCopper Wire Podcast 017 – RBA holds the toppings

VMM

'Big tick': Viridis positions for global leadership with Colossus pre-feasibility study

HotCopper Highlights: RIP to Botanix (for now); Droneshield new ATH; Trigg mystery halt

CWX

Carawine faces Fraser Range JV collapse as IGO moves to scrap partnership

AAU

Antilles brings Chinese ally on board to keep Neuva Sabana work chugging on

LIS

'Opens doors': Li-S Energy the first Oz company to produce lithium metal foils

AII

Inside the depths of Panasqueira: A legacy carved in rock

Week 28 Wrap: Tariff chaos back for some reason; CBA holds strong

Trump just dropped a 200% tariff bomb. Here's how to cash in

First 7 Last

SPONSORED BY