MESO Nasdaq update, page-4930

Yes, the earlier in the process of new tech the more you can make as your risk is higher and the potential timeline longer. This is why one can make more than those in CSL did. Anyone here should already be aware of the risks in MSB and be comfortable with them, so I see this a false argument for HOLDERS.

Big Pharma may well try and take over MSB but shareholders like me won't be selling to them unless legally forced to do so. I was forced to sell my RAP shares at >400% profit for example.

Typically, the 'independent expert" makes out how terrible the risks are going forward and how uncertain things are neglecting to mention that the party paying them is rather keen to take on those risks....... and is also paying them. I see this as a farcical thing. In the RAP case a HC person putting out his own valuation which was much higher was threatened with legal action and silenced. Big Pharma can of course bankrupt individuals as per this threat.

I am trying to forewarn people before Big Pharma turn up and possible dirty tricks and legal stunts that may occur.

Do your own sums per indication and arrive at your own prices for the future before we get handed a rubbish one. This site has prior efforts done in the past but adjust for the new market capitalization now and NEW indications. Don't forget the rest of the world.