I don't understand how they can be allowed to capital raise again without a full explanation of what happened to the $30m -- including who knew what and when.
Given that they never make a profit, that was literally $30m of shareholders' funds. If they fraudulently disposed of $30m of shareholders' funds in the past, why would you give them another $24m when all but one of same people - directors, executives - are still there doing the same thing?
AFR - Cap Raise, page-12
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 1 more message in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
