Lehrmann defamation trial judgement today, page-468

You are being an idiot.

Of course, I know that 1 minus 0.3 is 0.7. This is the essence of probability theory ie the subsets of the total 1.

I made the mistake, in your case, of assuming the reader did not need to be told such. That the reader could deduce that automatically if they had an understanding of probability theory.

My outrage is at the immoral behaviour of woman committing fraud on men and often doing this for >18 years on top of the cheating in the first place. I am further outraged that these women don't get jailed for such behaviour let alone also be made to pay the $$ back. Society has this wrong.

I understand ratios better than the average person in actual fact Dochico. My stock market returns are many times the average fund managers for this reason. I take on the chance of 100% loss for the chance of >100x returns and my successes despite being few in number totally outweigh the losses. Most people go nowhere near this sort of thing and don't have the IQ for it in the first place as lots of research required to cull the diamonds from the failures.

Not forgetting that at the very start, and without prompting, I also pointed out the figure for all of society was lower than the 30%. So you made a fool of yourself doubly given that.