Some substantiation of my so-called unsubstantiated claims>
I put it to you that Bruce may have been a mark. A mark in terms of a patsy by a woman to use the current legal system and political correctness that results in huge payments for sex scandals that she has seen occur several times over and thus her texts on requiring a sex scandal only weeks before the events in question. Add to this no doctors' proofs in actual fact when such was claimed initially to get the legal and press things moving.
More rubbish you say.... and fantasy on my part... that woman could be so callous and scheming as to chase big $$ using false allegations within the current legal system and current political correctness simping? Here you go from Melanie who can indeed be very rational >
And note that the felony fraud charge is very much the exception and men without the famous baseballers resources simply cannot fight such false allegations.
Bruce was known to ply woman with alcohol and try it on. He fits the profile of a patsy perfectly. He would have zero chance with a woman of quality.
- Forums
- Political Debate
- Lehrmann defamation trial judgement today
Lehrmann defamation trial judgement today, page-562
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 89 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Featured News
Featured News
The Watchlist
1CG
ONE CLICK GROUP LIMITED
Mark Waller, MD
Mark Waller
MD
Previous Video
Next Video
SPONSORED BY The Market Online